A Conspiracy Against Obamacare: The Volokh Conspiracy and the Health Care Case Kitap pdf indir

Randy E. Barnett, anayasa hukuku ve sözleşmeler öğrettiği Georgetown Üniversitesi Hukuk Merkezi'nde Carmack Waterhouse Hukuk Teorisi Profesörüdür. Northwestern Üniversitesi ve Harvard Hukuk Fakültesi'nden mezun olduktan sonra, Chicago'daki Cook County Eyaleti Avukatlık Bürosu'nda savcı olarak birçok ağır suç davasını denedi. Northwestern ve Harvard Hukuk Okulu'nda misafir profesör olarak bulundu. 2008 yılında Anayasa Araştırmaları alanında Guggenheim Bursu ile ödüllendirildi. 2004'te Barnett, Gonzalez v. Raich davasındaki tıbbi esrar davasını tartışmak için ABD Yüksek Mahkemesi'ne çıktı. Uluslararası dersler veriyor ve CBS Evening News, PBS NewsHour, Talk of the Nation (NPR), Hannity & Colmes (FOX) ve Ricki Lake Show gibi radyo ve televizyon programlarında yer aldı. Kobe 2000'de Tokyo Üniversitesi'nde ve Kyoto'daki Doshisha Üniversitesi'nde hukuk alanında dersler verdi. Barnett'in bursu, 80'den fazla makale ve incelemenin yanı sıra Restoring the Lost Constitution: The Presumption of Liberty (Princeton, 2004), Anayasa Hukuku: Cases in Context (Aspen 2008), Contracts Cases and Doctrine (Aspen, 4. ed. 2008) ve Cumhuriyet Anayasamız: Biz Halkın Özgürlüğünü ve Egemenliğini Güvence Altına Almak (Broadside Books, 2016).

A Conspiracy Against Obamacare: The Volokh Conspiracy and the Health Care Case kitap pdf oku ve indir Randy Barnett

The debate over the Affordable Care Act was one of the most important and public examinations of the Constitution in our history. At the forefront of that debate were the legal scholars blogging at the Volokh Conspiracy, who engaged in a spirited, erudite, and accessible discussion of the legal issues involved in the cases - beginning before the law was even passed. Several of the Volokh bloggers played key roles in developing the constitutional arguments against the ACA. Their blog posts and articles about the Act had a significant impact on both the public debate and the legal arguments in the case. It was perhaps the first time that a blog affected arguments submitted to the United States Supreme Court on a major issue. In the process, the bloggers helped legitimize a new type of legal discourse. This book compiles the discussion that unfolded at the Volokh Conspiracy blog into a readable narrative, enhanced with new context and analysis, as the contributors reflect on the Obamacare litigation with the advantage of hindsight. The different bloggers certainly did not always agree with each other, but the back-and-forth debates provide momentum as the reader follows the development of the arguments over time. A Conspiracy Against Obamacare exemplifies an important new form of legal discourse and public intellectualism.