Foucault pdf

吉尔·德勒兹（法语 Gilles Deleuze）（1925 年 1 月 18 日 - 1995 年 11 月 4 日）是一位法国哲学家，从 1950 年代初期到 1995 年去世，他的著作涉及哲学、文学、电影和美术。Plateau 1980，合着两者与精神分析师菲利克斯·加塔里 (Felix Guattari) 合作。他的形而上学论文《差异与重复》（1968）被许多学者认为是他最伟大的创作之一。哲学家阿德里安·威廉·摩尔将他列为“最伟大的哲学家”之一，引用了伯纳德·威廉姆斯关于伟大思想家的标准。尽管他过去将自己描述为“纯粹的形而上学”，但他的作品影响了哲学和艺术的各个学科，包括文学理论、后结构主义和后现代主义。 吉尔·德勒兹，以及许多受马克思主义启发的新斯宾诺斯主义者，如路易斯·阿尔都塞、艾蒂安·巴利巴尔和安东尼奥·内格里，是二十世纪末和二十一世纪初斯宾诺莎大陆哲学研究蓬勃发展的关键人物之一（或受后结构主义启发的法国斯宾诺莎主义的兴起），这是斯宾诺莎在历史上的第二次复兴，在大约 18 世纪末和 19 世纪初在德国哲学和文学中具有重要意义的新斯宾诺兹主义之后。德勒兹对斯宾诺莎的关注和崇敬在当代哲学中是众所周知的。正如皮埃尔·马切里所说，“德勒兹著作的一个重要部分是致力于阅读哲学家：斯托克斯、莱布尼茨、休谟、康德、尼采、柏格森等。但是这个名单上的一个个人职位将被分配给斯宾诺莎，因为他所对应的哲学兴趣。

Foucault pdf 吉尔·德勒兹

Being a Foucault fanatic who had never read Deleuze, I bought this merely because I wanted to read more about my favorite author and also because I knew how influential and important Deleuze was, not only for Foucault himself but in the field of continental philosophy in the last century.The further I read, the more fascinating I found Deleuze's analysis of Foucault's works and methods. Although he places his focus on mainly "The Archaeology of Knowledge" and "Discipline and Punish", he makes constant references to Foucault's other important works. What stands out as completely unique is the utterly and unsurpassably rigorous way in which Deleuze reads Foucault. Deleuze's prose is decidedly difficult, but if you're a Foucault reader who has had some contact with postmodern theories in the past then you'll at least grasp the meaning of his words. What's more, Deleuze breaks down Foucault's epistemological and methodological theorizing to their barest, making this an extremely important learning experience for those who wish to understand Foucault in-depth.This book is essential, but I also recommend you read it once you've become fairly familiar with Foucault... and as I said, I had never read Deleuze but that didn't stop me from finding this book to be absolute food for thought. Granted, it needs to be read MANY times to fully appreciate its potential and maybe integrate Deleuze's reflections into any kind of practical research... because I also found it to be enlightening in that respect.Had Foucault lived to read this book, I'm sure he would have been humbled to tears.Magnificent.